Which of the following is a factor to consider when determining the predominant aggressor?

• A. Whether either party acted in self-defense or in defense of any other person
• B. History of domestic abuse between the parties
• C. Statements made by witnesses
• D. The time since last incident

Answer: (C)

Understanding who is the predominant aggressor hinges on getting a clear picture of what happened and who posed the greater threat. Statements made by witnesses are valuable because they provide independent accounts that help establish the sequence of events, verify injuries or threats, and clarify who initiated or continued the violence. Witness testimony can corroborate or challenge self-defense claims and reveal patterns of coercive behavior that aren’t obvious from one side alone. While self-defense, and history of abuse, are relevant considerations, witnesses’ accounts directly inform the assessment of the immediate aggressor. The time since the last incident is less helpful for determining who was predominantly aggressing in the current encounter.