Which of the following is NOT a step in the forensic experimental trauma interview?

• A. Acknowledge their trauma/pain/difficult situation
• B. Do not record any statements
• C. What were your reactions to this experience?
• D. Clarify other information and details after you facilitate all you can about the experience

Answer: (B)

The key idea here is that a forensic trauma interview relies on documenting the survivor’s disclosure accurately and reliably. Recording statements (with appropriate consent) is a standard, essential part of the process because it preserves the exact words and details, supports careful analysis later, and ensures there is a verifiable record for investigations and reporting.

Acknowledge the person’s trauma or difficult situation helps build trust, validates their experience, and can reduce re-traumatization. Asking about their reactions to the experience helps identify emotional responses, gauge impact, and guide how the interview proceeds. Clarifying other information after you’ve explored the core details ensures you capture completeness, resolve inconsistencies, and confirm accuracy.

Therefore, the option that says not to record any statements does not fit with the expected practice, since withholding recording would undermine accuracy, accountability, and the usefulness of the interview in a forensic context.